ChatGPT helped refine and clarify (pointed out ambiguity and lack of clarity) the following:
I thinking feeling sentient creature cannot afford to be 100% true to their inner directives and impulses.
Bayesian logic, whether we are aware of it or not, if part of what helps the creativity and wide assortment of thought processes that humans go through, we don’t control, necessarily the order of things that we encounter learn process and assembly into our mental model, but all of it contributes to the output of that model.
It researched and identified currently known and bleading edge research and theories to filter ideas and then suggested the following:
A sentient creature cannot afford to be fully faithful to its inner directives, not because those directives are false, but because their unfiltered enactment is maladaptive. Human cognition appears to operate through probabilistic (Bayesian-like) processes that integrate uncontrolled inputs, ordering effects, and emotional salience into a mental model whose outputs are not consciously authored. Creativity and adaptability arise from this partial incoherence, while the frontal cortex functions not as a suppressor, but as a moderator—selectively permitting, delaying, or reshaping impulses to balance survival, meaning, and social viability.
Did it stray or does this stay true to intent?
Leave a Reply